189 / 190 Special report on the pitfalls of 'full-score secondary applicants' in skilled migration

189 / 190 Special report on the pitfalls of 'full-score secondary applicants' in skilled migration

1 | Why is everyone striving for a 'full-score secondary applicant'

A spouse (secondary applicant) can bring up to 10 points for the main applicant. Combined with advantages in age, English proficiency, education, etc., many can reach

the 'hot range' of 85 – 95 points. However, immigration law is extremely detailed, and a slight oversight can lead to rejection due to 'invalid points'. This article combines the latest official regulations with

real industry cases to outline the 8 most common pitfalls.

2 | 2025 Official Spouse Points Rules Overview

• 10 points: Skilled spouse (under 45 years old + Competent English + valid skills assessment)

o 189 visa: Spouse's occupation must be on the MLTSSL (Long-term List)

o 190 visa: Spouse's occupation can be on the MLTSSL or STSOL

• 5 points: English-speaking spouse (only requires Competent English, no skills assessment needed)

• 10 points: Single / Spouse is already an Australian citizen or PR

⚠ The above points must not only be valid on the day of invitation but also meet the additional conditions listed below, otherwise, it will be considered 'false declaration'.

3 | 189 vs 190: Hidden Rule Differences

image.png

4 | Eight High-frequency Pitfalls for 'Full-score Secondary Applicant'

1. Occupation list misalignment

o 189 spouse's occupation falls on STSOL ➜ 0 points.

o A single word difference is common in IT, engineering, education, and training occupations.

2. Skills assessment or English score expired

o Most assessments are valid for 3 years, some (e.g., accounting/audit) only 2 years.

o If the expiry date is before the invitation date, 10 points are instantly void.

3. Spouse age threshold

o On the 45th birthday, the points qualification is lost. Don't let the EOI wait too long.

4. Post-invitation 'status change' caught by the system

o Example: Invited as 'single +10 points', but cohabiting or registering marriage after submission, leading to a total score drop ➜ direct visa refusal. The law clearly states that spouse points must still be met at visa approval.

5. EOI score chasing resets date-of-effect to zero

o Although higher points after adding English/work experience, the queue order is reset; for popular occupations, this might mean a later invitation.

6. Overlooking state nomination additional clauses (190)

o E.g., NSW requires both main and spouse to reside in the state; WA requires spouse's occupation also on the state list.

7. Secondary applicant forgot to apply together

o Only included spouse information at the EOI stage but 'applied alone' in the formal application ➜ immigration officer sees it as inconsistent, points invalid.

8. Contradictory information triggers 'false representation' investigation

o When applying for a spouse visa later, if immigration finds conflicts with the previous 'single' declaration in old visa history, Form 80 addresses, etc., even obtained PR may be revoked.